Comments on: require_gem ‘activerecord’ http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/ A place for opinions and notes of a valibuk. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:53:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: ondrej http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-145431 ondrej Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:34:12 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-145431 you are welcome :) you are welcome :)

]]> By: Charlie http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-145371 Charlie Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:34:25 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-145371 Thanks dude! Annoying stuff... Thanks dude! Annoying stuff…

]]> By: john http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-82890 john Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:34:44 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-82890 thank you thank you thank you - you rescued my evening! thank you thank you thank you - you rescued my evening!

]]> By: ondrej http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-81850 ondrej Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:19:15 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-81850 yeah, we are so lazy :) yeah, we are so lazy :)

]]> By: Magirus http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-80843 Magirus Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:15:07 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-80843 I hate this! Programmers are so lazy. The right thing would be to give a warning when using require_gem that it is outdated and how you should use it now. And why the activerecord has an underscore it one case and not in the other is another man made trap by someone that was thinking too short and leads to madness... Sad. Really sad. I hate this!
Programmers are so lazy.

The right thing would be to give a warning when using require_gem that it is outdated and how you should use it now.

And why the activerecord has an underscore it one case and not in the other is another man made trap by someone that was thinking too short and leads to madness…

Sad. Really sad.

]]> By: RRob http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-59384 RRob Fri, 16 May 2008 12:58:18 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-59384 Thanks, a bunch Thanks, a bunch

]]> By: H http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-56237 H Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:21:44 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-56237 Thank you! I had this issue while following an example in my Ruby on Rails book and this solved it quickly! Thank you! I had this issue while following an example in my Ruby on Rails book and this solved it quickly!

]]> By: Tom http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-54949 Tom Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:32:05 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-54949 Thanks, You just got me on the road quickly with this, since I had just falled in the same hole, ... thanks! Thanks, You just got me on the road quickly with this, since
I had just falled in the same hole, … thanks!

]]> By: dev http://www.valibuk.net/2008/03/require_gem-activerecord/#comment-51626 dev Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:48:28 +0000 http://www.valibuk.net/?p=61#comment-51626 Best answer to annoying problem Best answer to annoying problem

]]>